Specificity and sensitivity assessment of selected nasal provocation testing techniques

نویسندگان

  • Edyta Krzych-Fałta
  • Konrad Furmańczyk
  • Bolesław Samoliński
چکیده

INTRODUCTION Nasal provocation testing involves an allergen-specific local reaction of the nasal mucosa to the administered allergen. AIM To determine the most objective nasal occlusion assessment technique that could be used in nasal provocation testing. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 60 subjects, including 30 patients diagnosed with allergy to common environmental allergens and 30 healthy subjects were enrolled into the study. The method used in the study was a nasal provocation test with an allergen, with a standard dose of a control solution and an allergen (5,000 SBU/ml) administered using a calibrated atomizer into both nostrils at room temperature. Early-phase nasal mucosa response in the early phase of the allergic reaction was assessed via acoustic rhinometry, optical rhinometry, nitric oxide in nasal air, and tryptase levels in the nasal lavage fluid. RESULTS In estimating the homogeneity of the average values, the Levene's test was used and receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for all the methods used for assessing the nasal provocation test with an allergen. Statistically significant results were defined for p < 0.05. Of all the objective assessment techniques, the most sensitive and characteristic ones were the optical rhinometry techniques (specificity = 1, sensitivity = 1, AUC = 1, PPV = 1, NPV = 1). CONCLUSIONS The techniques used showed significant differences between the group of patients with allergic rhinitis and the control group. Of all the objective assessment techniques, those most sensitive and characteristic were the optical rhinometry.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Usefulness of House Dust Mite Nasal Provocation Test in Asthma

PURPOSE We previously reported that the skin prick test was sensitive and the serum specific immunoglobulin E test was specific for predicting positive airway responses to house dust mites (HDMs) in patients with asthma. Because the nose and bronchus are one airway, the nasal provocation test would be more specific for predicting the bronchial responses to HDM than the skin test. METHODS The ...

متن کامل

Allergen-specific nasal provocation testing: review by the rhinoconjunctivitis committee of the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

Specific nasal provocation testing (NPT) consists of eliciting a response from the nasal mucosa by controlled exposure to allergens. It is indicated in the diagnostic confirmation of allergic rhinitis and when discrepancies arise or difficulties exist in the assessment of a patient's medical history and the results of skin and/or serological tests. The technique is also applied to evaluate sens...

متن کامل

Review: skin and in vitro tests for allergic rhinitis vary widely in usefulness.

M e t h o d s Data sources: MEDLINE (January 1995 to March 2003), references of practice guidelines and review articles, and specialists. Study selection and assessment: Studies that compared skin tests or in vitro tests with a gold standard. Gold standard tests involved 1 of 3 methods: clinical criteria (established by ≥ 2 clinicians correlating patients’ symptoms and signs); a composite (hist...

متن کامل

Evaluation of Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Nasal Fracture and Compared it with Plain Radiography in Dogs

Objective- One of the important causes of nasal fracture is a trauma that can be diagnosed in clinical examinations and diagnostic imaging but it should be noted that radiography may show false fractures in the nose. This study evaluates the value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of nasal fractures and compared it with plain radiography. Design- Retrospective study. Animals- 12 d...

متن کامل

Comparison of conjunctival and nasal provocation tests in allergic rhinitis children with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus sensitization.

BACKGROUND Nasal provocation tests (NPTs) are indicated in confirming the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis if the clinical history, skin tests or sIgE are inconclusive. NPTs are time- consuming, technically difficult and expensive to perform. Consequently, conjunctival provocation tests (CPTs), which are easier, cheaper and safer should be considered as an alternative method. No recent study has ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 33  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016